Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bond v. DIRECTV, Inc.
as 5:2011cv02457
Plaintiff: Jennifer Bond
Defendant: DIRECTV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Bauchmoyer et al
as 2:2011cv00934
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant: Delano R. Bauchmoyer and El Condor Imports Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Holtsberry et al
as 3:2010cv02278
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant: Thomas R Holtsberry, Richard Watkins and Holtsberry Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Directv, Inc. v. Slogar et al
as 5:2010cv01839
Plaintiff: Directv, Inc.
Defendant: Ronald E Slogar and Loch Erie Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Bolognue et al
as 5:2010cv01052
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant: Michael Bolognue and English Stick, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Boyd et al
as 1:2010cv00534
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant: James G Boyd and Cornerstone Bar & Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Lokar et al
as 2:2009cv00789
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant: Mark C. Lokar and RPM Management Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Type: Other Statutes None
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Tabbaa et al
as 5:2009cv02092
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant: Mohammad Tabbaa, Luna's Deli and Grille, Inc. and Lunas Deli & Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Type: Other Statutes None
Stachurski et al v. DIRECTV, Inc.
as 1:2008cv02850
Plaintiff: Dolores Stachurski and Bob Kravos, Jr.
Defendant: DIRECTV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Davis v. JBM, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00642
Plaintiff: Christopher Davis
Defendant: JBM, Inc., Directech Holding Company, Inc. and DIRECTV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?