Cases 11 - 20 of 128
DOE v. WREN
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and CARLTON HUFFMAN
Defendant:
CAROLINE WREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
BEN HAIM v. DOE
as 1:2022cv03536
Plaintiff:
Tamar Ben Haim
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
LEWIS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2022cv03148
Plaintiff:
IRVINA P. LEWIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and JANE DOE
GRAY v. BAUM et al
as 1:2022cv01858
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD GRAY
Defendant:
PHILLIS BAUM, HEATHER LONG and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
RIVERA v. FARMERS INSURANCE et al
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
JESSICA RIVERA
Defendant:
FARMERS INSURANCE doing business as TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE doing business as FARMERS GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
BURRS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURRS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GRAY v. LONG et al
as 1:2021cv02672
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD GRAY
Defendant:
HEATHER B. LONG, JANE DOE and KEVIN E. BEHRNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. KAUFMAN et al
as 1:2021cv02170
Plaintiff:
Erin O Smith, Estate of Jeffrey Smith and ERIN SMITH
Defendant:
David C Kaufman, DAVID KAUFMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2021cv02142
Plaintiff:
Doe John and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
STATES UNITED and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
KLAYMAN v. KAISER et al
as 1:2021cv00727
Defendant:
MATTHEW KAISER, HAMILTON FOX, III, JULIA PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
