Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Christopher Kotulak v. William F. Davis, MD et al
as 2:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kotulak
Defendant:
Dr. William F Davis, MD, LaVeta Medical Center, Bard Davol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Camden v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03878
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 inclusive, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Camden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allied Feather and Down Corp. v. Down-lite International, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Down-Lite International, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Allied Feather and Down Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maroti v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00882
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C R Bard Inc, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Herayer Maroti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
