Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Saiyed v. Archon, Inc.
as 21-2298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMJAD SAIYED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHON, INC., ARCHON DISTRIBUTION, INC., RASHID PATEL and others
Mankaruse v. Intel Corporation
as 20-2297
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, MATTHEW ROBERT HULSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGUI MANKARUSE
Plasola v. State of California
as 20-1555
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER HUBBARD, DOES, 1-10 and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE B. PLASOLA
SiOnyx LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.
as 20-1217
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and OCEAN OPTICS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K. and HAMAMATSU CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIONYX LLC and PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Askan v. Faro Technologies, Inc.
as 19-2412
Defendant / Appellee:
FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOLDAS ASKAN
SiOnyx LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.
as 19-2359
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and OCEAN OPTICS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and SIONYX LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K. and HAMAMATSU CORPORATION
Jenkins v. BNSF Railway Company
as 19-1691
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and SMART UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION
Maatuk v. Emerson Electric, Inc.
as 19-1615
Defendant / Appellee:
THERM-O-DISC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEF MAATUK
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, EMERSON ELECTRIC, INC., PRASAD KHADKIKAR and others
MM&R PRODUCTS V STITCH N GENIUS
as 10-1072
Defendant-Appellant:
Does 1-10, inclusive, Elias Amkie, Stitch N' Genius, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
MM&R Products, Inc., TRE Milano, LLC, MM&R Products, Inc. and others
HEELING SPORTS V US FURONG
as 08-1483
Defendant-Appellee:
2000 Shoes, Air Fly, Apple Footwear Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Heeling Sports Limited
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
