Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Jalana Bouldin v. Mortgage Electronic Registrati, et al
as 15-11260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JALANA BOULDIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., PINE STATE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA and others
Bouldin v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03214
Plaintiff:
Jalana Bouldin
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Pine State Mortgage Corporation, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Dees et al v. Countrywide Bank, FSB et al
as 1:2014cv00567
Plaintiff:
Patti Dees and James R Dees
Defendant:
Countrywide Bank, FSB, Federal National Mortgage Association As Trustee For Securitized Trust Fannie Mae Remic Trust 2008-29, Federal National Morgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Bragg v. BayRock Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00904
Plaintiff:
David E. Bragg
Defendant:
BayRock Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS), Bank of America, N.A. and others
Coachman v. U.S. Bank, N.A., MERS et al
as 1:2012cv22073
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coachman
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., MERS and Does 1-100 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pounds et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60692
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Pounds, Nancy C. Pounds, Vern S. Simmons and others
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , Bank of America , The Bank of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Groom v. Bank of America et al
as 8:2008cv02567
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Groom and Elizabeth Groom
Defendant:
Bank of America, Fifth Third Bank, Carolina First Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Barrett v. Fiserv, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv02568
Plaintiff:
John J. Barrett, III and John J. Barrett, III
Defendant:
Fiserv, Inc., First Trust Corporation, Retirement Accounts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
