Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Kulick v. United States Internal Revenue Service, et al.
as 24-2462
Plaintiff: R. J. KULICK
Defendant: UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and DOES, 1-100, Inclusive
Kulick v. Olmstead, et al.
as 24-2129
Plaintiff: R. J. KULICK
Defendant: REED H. OLMSTEAD, LAW OFFICES OF REED H. OLMSTEAD and DOES, 1-100, inclusive
Egan v. Wei, et al.
as 24-1755
Plaintiff: MICHAEL EGAN
Defendant: MAGGIE M. WEI, individually, M.D. in her official capcity, TRAN B. LOCKE, individually, M.D. in her official capacity, ALVIN H. NGUYEN, individually, D.O. in his official capacity and others
Egan v. Wei, et al.
as 24-1714
Plaintiff: MICHAEL EGAN
Defendant: MAGGIE M. WEI, individually, M.D. in her official capcity, TRAN B. LOCKE, individually, M.D. in her official capacity, ALVIN H. NGUYEN, individually, D.O. in his official capacity and others
WheelImage Corp. v. Axial Manufacturing, et al.
as 24-1381
Plaintiff: WHEELIMAGE CORP.
Defendant: AXIAL MANUFACTURING, VF ENGINEERING, RICK EMMETT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55814
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55620
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55472
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Michael Egan v. Jeffrey Rosenbloom, et al
as 23-55454
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL EGAN
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFREY ROSENBLOOM, ANDREA CABARDO, SHARYN DANIELSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55262
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?