Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Donald Trump, et al v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 23-10387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Interested Party:
ALINA HABBA, HABBA MADAIO & ASSOCIATES and JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC., JOHN PODESTA and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Trump v. Clinton et al
as 2:2022cv14102
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Trump
Defendant:
Hillary R. Clinton, Democratic National Committee, HFACC, Inc. and others
Appellant:
Alina Habba, Michael T Madaio, Habba Madaio & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Donald Trump, et al v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 23-13177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALINA HABBA, DONALD J. TRUMP, MICHAEL T. MADAIO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, HFACC, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 22-13410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, HFACC, INC. and others
Caplan et al v. Trump
as 0:2023cv61628
Plaintiff:
Lawrence A. Caplan, Barry Butin and Michael Strainese
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 0437 Federal Election Commission
John CastroIn re: John Castro
as 23-11837
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN CASTRO
Respondent:
DONALD J. TRUMP
John Castro v. Donald TrumpIn re: John Castro v. Donald Trump
as 23-10531
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN CASTRO
Not Yet Classified:
DONALD J. TRUMP
In re: John Castro
as 23-10429
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN CASTRO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONALD J. TRUMP
Trump v. James
as 9:2022cv81780
Plaintiff:
Donald J Trump
Defendant:
Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In re: John McCarthy
as 22-13791
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Interested Party:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
