Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diogenes Limited et al. v. DraftKings Inc.
as 1:2021cv01695
Plaintiff:
Diogenes Limited and Colossus (IOM) Limited
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BETEIRO, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
as 2:2021cv20148
Plaintiff:
BETEIRO, LLC
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BETEIRO, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
as 1:2021cv20148
Plaintiff:
BETEIRO, LLC
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
AG 18, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
as 2:2021cv15737
Plaintiff:
AG 18, LLC doing business as ARROW GAMING
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AG 18, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
as 1:2021cv15737
Plaintiff:
AG 18, LLC doing business as ARROW GAMING
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AG 18, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
as 2:2021cv15737
Plaintiff:
AG 18, LLC doing business as ARROW GAMING
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS INC. and CROWN GAMING INC.
Counter Defendant:
AG 18, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WINVIEW INC. v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
as 3:2021cv13405
Plaintiff:
WINVIEW INC.
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Interactive Games LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01105
Plaintiff:
Interactive Games LLC
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01041
Consolidated Defendant:
bwin.party (USA), Inc., 888 Holdings PLC, Big Fish Games, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Interactive Games LLC, Interactive Games Limited and CG Technology Development, LLC
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01040
Plaintiff:
CG Technology Development, LLC , Interactive Games Limited and Interactive Games LLC
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
