Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC et al v. VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPERESS SOMERDALE LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04376
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DUNKIN' BRANDS, INC. and others
Defendant: VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPERESS SOMERDALE LLC, VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS TURNERSVILLE LLC, VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SEWELL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHINGS LLC et al v. VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SOMERDALE LLC et al
as 1:2021cv17719
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHINGS LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC and DD IP HOLDER LLC
Defendant: VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SOMERDALE LLC, VICKY AND BONNY COFFEE EXPRESS TURNERSVILLE LLC, VICKY AND CONNY COFFEE EXPRESS SEWELL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, et al v. KK MARKET ST. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11730
Defendant: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, et al., KK MARKET ST. LLC, KERTAIN KAPADIA and others
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, BR IP HOLDER LLC, BASKIN-ROBBINS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. LGH HOLDINGS, LLC. et al
as 3:2013cv02063
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC , DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC , DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant: LGH HOLDINGS, LLC. , HAUCK HOLDINGS LLC. , GEORGE HAUCK III and others
Counter_claimant: GEORGE HAUCK III , HAUCK HOLDINGS LLC. , LAURA BOMENSATT HAUCK and others
Counter_defendant: BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED SHOPS, LLC. , BR IP HOLDER LLC , DB REAL ESTATE ASSETS I, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Type: Contract Franchise
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. JFM MARKET, LLC. et al
as 2:2011cv06681
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC , DD IP HOLDER LLP , BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED SHOPS LLC and others
Defendant: JFM MARKET, LLC., RAMESH JETHWA, ANIL JETHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. MILLSTONE ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv05203
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC , DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC , DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant: MILLSTONE ENTERPRISES, LLC , RBK INVESTMENTS, LLC , OLDBRIDGE TROMBO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Type: Contract Franchise
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. HN EAST HANOVER DONUTS LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03715
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC , DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC and DD IP HOLDER LLC
Defendant: HN EAST HANOVER DONUTS LLC , NH PARSIPPANY DONUTS LLC , NH PINE BROOK DONUTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. NB COMBO, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv03793
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC , DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC , DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant: NB COMBO, INC., FRESH POND COMBO, INC., CONDUIT DONUTS OF QUEENS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. COFFEE OF PATERSON, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv06449
Plaintiff: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant: COFFEE OF PATERSON, INC. and DHARMESH SHAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. JF-TOTOWA DONUTS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02636
Plaintiff: DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant: JF-TOTOWA DONUTS, INC., GA NEWTON DONUTS LLC, JF- WHARTON DONUTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?