Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Capobianco v. DaimlerChrysler Corp et al
as 2:2008cv00329
Plaintiff:
Joan Capobianco, Joan Capobianco, Joan Capobianco and others
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corp and Chrysler, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00724
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Nicodemus v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
as 8:2007cv01597
Plaintiff:
Pauline Nicodemus
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation and DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv61219
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv61212
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Rutkowski v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Pension Plan et al
as 6:2007cv00965
Plaintiff:
Michael Rutkowski
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Pension Plan and DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Board of Administrators
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hart v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Alan David Hart and Alan David Hart
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Phoenix USA, Inc., Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv60510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Grabner v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
as 6:2007cv00603
Plaintiff:
Michelle Grabner
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation and DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
