Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Severt v. UiPath, Inc.
as 25-2800
Plaintiff:
PAUL SEVERT and SAMHITA GERA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UIPATH, INC., DANIEL DINES, ASHIM GUPTA and others
Clifton Murie v. Philippe Botteri et al
as 1:2025cv03497
Plaintiff:
Clifton Murie
Defendant:
Philippe Botteri, Michael Gordon, Daniel Springer and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
Samhita Gera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Brunozzi v. UiPath, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05959
Defendant:
Robert Enslin, UiPath, Inc., Ashim Gupta and others
Plaintiff:
Simone Brunozzi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Gera v. Dines et al
as 1:2024cv05157
Defendant:
UiPath, Inc., Daniel Dines, Daniel Springer and others
Plaintiff:
Samhita Gera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Steiner v. UiPath, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04702
Defendant:
UiPath, Inc., Robert Enslin, Ashim Gupta and others
Plaintiff:
Zack Steiner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ristea v. Botteri et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Octavian Ristea
Defendant:
Philippe Botteri, Daniel Dines, Carl Eschenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Gervat et al v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Bowling v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Maren K. Bowling
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Michael Bernstein, Maren K. Bowling and Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Polilingua Limited v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv08810
Plaintiff:
Polilingua Limited
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
