Cases filed in the United States Federal Claims Court
Cases 1 - 10 of 97
HAIT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00548
Petitioner: DANIEL HAIT
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BARTELT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00449
Petitioner: DANIEL BARTELT
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BRUNELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00421
Petitioner: DANIEL BRUNELL
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024vv00289
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SWINTON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00267
Petitioner: DANIEL SWINTON
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CIRANNI et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: PIETRO CIRANNI, PAUL BRUMLEY, CHAD SCHOFIELD and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BAILEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02140
Petitioner: DANIELLE BAILEY
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
WARD v. USA
as 1:2023cv01953
Plaintiff: DANIEL WARD
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ROMO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01804
Petitioner: DANIEL THOMAS ROMO
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff: DANIEL BLAND, JOHN AGUZZI, ARRINGTON FARMS, INC. and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?