Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shipley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Shipley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Senogles v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Jesse Daniel Senogles
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reynolds v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2013cv01420
Plaintiff:
Daniel Floyd Reynolds
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bucy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2012cv01237
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bucy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Opper v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2010cv02519
Plaintiff:
Daniel Phillip Opper, Sr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vaden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2010cv01255
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vaden
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bucy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2009cv01223
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bucy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2008cv02477
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Pressler v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv04094
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Pressler
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
