Cases 41 - 50 of 4,227
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-2179
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ, GABRIELA CACERES GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Melara-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2187
Petitioner:
ERIC DANIEL MELARA-MARTINEZ, EVELYN CAROLINA RAMOS RUIZ, STEVEN MISAEL MARTINEZ RAMOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quinto-Collins, et al. v. City of Antioch, et al.
as 24-2126
Plaintiff:
MARIA CASSANDRA QUINTO-COLLINS and ISABELLA COLLINS
Defendant:
CITY OF ANTIOCH, JAMES PERKINSON, ARTURO BECERRA and others
United States of America v. Daniel Roger Hood
as 2:2024cv02836
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Roger Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Cluse v. Rowden, et al.
as 24-2045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILLIAM CLUSE
Defendant:
TRAVIS JAMES ROWDEN, in his individual and official capacities, COUNTY OF COCONINO and JIM DRISCOLL, Sheriff
United States of America v. Rivera-Anaya
as 24-2040
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL RIVERA-ANAYA
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Canelas Matute, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1894
Petitioner:
YLSI ROXANA CANELAS MATUTE, CHRISTIAN YAHIR CANELAS MATUTE and WILMER DANIEL ESPINOZA CANELAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ferreira v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gomes Ferreira
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
