Cases 21 - 30 of 1,436
Chow v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chow
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Vikram Luthar and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. STRATFS, LLC et al
as 1:2024mc20262
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of The State of New York by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Meek v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bryan Meek and Monteverde & Associates PC
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Peter R. Ingram, Lawrence S. Hershfield and others
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Orozco v. Stairs et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Noah Orozco
Defendant:
Janice Stairs, Karl Hanneman, David Peat and others
Owen v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
DeAnn Owen
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
GABEL v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERRY GABEL
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
SARVER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
WADE SARVER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Gervat v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse Brett Biggs, Melanie Boulden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
