Cases 21 - 30 of 163
Adams v. Boulware II et al
as 2:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Judge Richard F Boulware II, Judge Daniel J Albregts, Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clervrain et al v. Ebert et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmanuel Benjoassaint, Kaity Borgella and others
Defendant:
Jhone Ebert, Charles Daniels, Ann Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norr v. Australis Capital (Nevada), Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00338
Petitioner:
Daniel Norr
Respondent:
Australis Capital (Nevada), Inc. and Australis Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00336
Defendant:
Daniel Norr and Australis Capital (Nevada), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00337
Defendant:
Daniel Norr and Australis Capital (Nevada), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00320
Claimant:
Daniel Norr
Respondent:
Australis Capital (Nevada), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Bernstein v. MP Materials Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv00315
Defendant:
MP Materials Corp., Fortress Value Acquisition Corp., James H. Litinsky and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Bernstein and Carmelo Zappulla
Petitioner:
Denis Bourque and Mark Jurkiewicz
NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00324
Claimant:
Daniel Norr
Respondent:
Australis Capital (Nevada), inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Ladah Law Firm, PLLC v. Rodriguez-Fuentes et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ladah Law Firm, PLLC
Defendant:
Asley Rodriguez-Fuentes, Osvaldo Rodriguez, Office of the District Attorney, Clark County, Family Support Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
