Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Thompson et al v. Masterson et al
as 5:2023cv04120
Plaintiff:
Mike Thompson and Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Ty Masterson and Daniel Hawkins
Intervenor:
Ethan Corson, Dinah Sykes, Marci Francisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Watson v. Kansas Employment Security Board of Review
as 2:2022cv02438
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah Danielle Watson
Defendant:
Kansas Employment Security Board of Review
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Expressions Capital LLC v. Lowe et al
as 2:2022cv02178
Plaintiff:
Expressions Capital LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Lowe, Legacy Hutto, LLC, Legacy Venture West II, LLC and others
CVS Hutto LLC v. Lowe et al
as 2:2022cv02165
Plaintiff:
CVS Hutto LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Lowe, Legacy Hutto, LLC, Legacy Venture West II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
AVD Bellmont LLC v. Lowe et al
as 2:2022cv02153
Plaintiff:
AVD Bellmont LLC
Defendant:
Daniel H. Lowe, Legacy Venture West II, LLC, Venture West II, LC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Kansas, State of v. Jackson
as 6:2021cv01149
Defendant:
Daniel J. Jackson
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
