Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Montero v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv20168
Plaintiff:
Guillermo A. Montero
Defendant:
United States Of America, Daniel Santilli, Approximately $980,091.52, Substitute Res for 1270 99th Street, Miami Beach, Florida 33134 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States of America v. Approximately $3,275.20 Seized from Bank of America Account Number 229052527244, et al
as 1:2021cv20614
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $3,275.20 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER 229052527244, Real property located at 401 69 Street, #704, Miami, Florida 33141, Approximately $7,696,846.04 seized from UBS account number FL 14453 N in the name of Daniel and Leonardo Santilli Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Leonardo Santilli Tomasicchio, Daniel Santilli Garcia, Sabrina Santillo Tomasicchio and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0781
United States of America v. Various Real Properties
as 0:2009cv61780
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
D&L Partners, L.P., D3 Capital Club, LLC, The Von Allmen Dynasty Trust and others
Defendant:
Various Real Properties, Real Properties (RP9) through (RP21), Vehicles and Vessels (VV1) through (VV27) and others
Claimant:
VRLP1, LLC, Razorback Funding, LLC, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Property forfeiture from criminal acts
United States of America v. Assets Described in "Attachment A" to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem
as 6:2009cv01852
Claimant:
First Security Bank & Trust Company, Raul Rojer, Skyview Construction, LLC and others
Defendant:
Assets Described in "Attachment A" to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. Clephar
as 6:2007cv01814
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Clephar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
