Cases 1 - 10 of 743
Sharp v. Parks
as 8:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Gregory Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Horn v. New Haven
as 24-1034
Plaintiff:
VERNON HORN
Defendant:
PETISIA ADGER, in their individual capacities, LEE DEASE, Executor of the Estate of Leroy Dease, DARYLE BRELAND, in their individual capacities and others
Jackson v. New Haven
as 24-1038
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS JACKSON
Defendant:
PETISIA ADGER, in their individual capacities, DARYLE BRELAND, in their individual capacities, LEE DEASE, Executor of the Estate of Leroy Dease and others
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Jones v. Morgan, et al.
as 24-2271
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JONES
Defendant:
DARYL MORGAN, JOHN HOFFMAN and MATTHEW GILLIS
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE et al v. HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, MILDRED FERN BURLEY, SILVIA FAWN BURLEY and others
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, BRYAN NEWLAND and AMY DUTSCHKE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Williams v. Smith
as 24-760
Petitioner:
STEPHEN J. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
DARYL NORVAL SMITH, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as a representative for the FAA administrator, JASON AUBREY GEORGE, in his official capacity as manager of the FAA Bradley Flight Standards District Office, now retired, BILLY JOE NOLEN, in his capacity as the acting administrator of the FAA and others
Hash v. Giacomazzi, et al.
as 24-1248
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH
Defendant:
M. GIACOMAZZI, DARYL DORSEY, D. PETROVIC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
