Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97365
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21549
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv72848
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54101
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09036
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Hills et al
as 0:2016cv60033
Defendant:
Todd Hills and David Carr
Plaintiff:
Nykia Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
as 8:2014cv02867
Plaintiff:
David Carr
Defendant:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. Randazza Legal Group et al
as 1:2013cv21924
Defendant:
Michael Whiteacre, Randazza Legal Group, Marc J. Randazza and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox and 1-50 John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carr v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv14270
Plaintiff:
David Carr
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0206 Social Security Benefits
Goldberg et al v. Carr
as 1:2008cv21098
Plaintiff:
Michael I. Goldberg, Michael I. Goldberg, The Entertainment Group Fund, Inc. and others
Defendant:
David Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
