Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Benjamin Woodhouse v. United States Government, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55636
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, R. GARY KLAUSNER, United States District Court Judge and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55598
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55463
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Hassan Abpikar v. Dwayne Sanchez, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16735
Plaintiff - Appellant: HASSAN ABPIKAR
Defendant - Appellee: DWAYNE SANCHEZ, DHS/ICE Special Federal Agent, ROBERT CARR, FBI Agent within the DHS of ICE and the Head of Anti-Terrorism Unit, San Jose Division, DAVID HARRIS, DHS/ICE Special Federal Agent and others
Reena Frailich, et al v. McGuire Woods, LLP
as 10-55342
Plaintiff - Appellee: REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL, KARI BREWER and others
Plaintiff: LISA GINTZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated, RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and LOREDANA NESCI
Appellant: SANDRA DISNER, Executor of the Estate of Eliot G. Disner, as successor-in-interest to Eliot G. Disner and Disner Law Corporation, Class Counsel, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP and others
Objector: ARCELIA TREVINO, SINDELL AND SIEGEL, DAVID FELDMAN and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff: BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI and KAPLAN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Movant: RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
Reena Frailich, et al v. Sandra Disner, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-55309
Plaintiff - Appellee: REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL, KARI BREWER and others
Plaintiff: RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, LISA GINTZ and LOREDANA NESCI
Appellant: SANDRA DISNER, Executor of the Estate of Eliot G. Disner, as successor-in-interest to Eliot G. Disner and Disner Law Corporation, Class Counsel, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP and others
Objector: ARCELIA TREVINO, SINDELL AND SIEGEL, DAVID FELDMAN and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff: BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI and KAPLAN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Movant: RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
Ryan Rodriguez, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al
as 09-56500
Plaintiff - Appellee: RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL and others
Objector - Appellant: ROBERT JOSEPH GAUDET, Jr.
Objector: SARAH SIEGEL, EVANS & MULLINIX, PA, JENNIFER BROWN MCELROY and others
Intervenor: BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI, KAPLAN, INC., A Delaware corporation and THOMSON CORPORATION
Movant: RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
Ryan Rodriguez, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al
as 09-56314
Plaintiff - Appellee: RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL and others
Objector - Appellant: SARAH SIEGEL, EVANS & MULLINIX, PA, JENNIFER BROWN MCELROY and others
Objector: GEORGE SCHNEIDER, Class Member, JONATHAN M. SLOMBA, Class Member, JAMES PUNTUMAPANITCH, Class Member and others
Intervenor: BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI, KAPLAN, INC., A Delaware corporation and THOMSON CORPORATION
Movant: RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
Ryan Rodriguez, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-56278
Plaintiff - Appellee: RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL and others
Objector - Appellant: GEORGE SCHNEIDER, Class Member, JONATHAN M. SLOMBA, Class Member, JAMES PUNTUMAPANITCH, Class Member and others
Objector: ARCELIA TREVINO, SINDELL AND SIEGEL, DAVID FELDMAN and others
Defendant: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI, KAPLAN, INC., A Delaware corporation and THOMSON CORPORATION
Movant: RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?