Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Campos v. Lavinsky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01278
Plaintiff: Joseph Campos
Defendant: Roger Lavinsky, David Jaroslawicz, Cartaflash Slattery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-865
Creditor - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv04724
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv04074
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Bravo v. 57th Restaurant Associates LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv08492
Plaintiff: Isaac Pavia Bravo
Defendant: 57th Restaurant Associates LLC, Marvin Azrak, Richard Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Advanced Magnetic v. Rome Fastener Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1998cv07766
Plaintiff: Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc.
Defendant: Rome Fastener Corporation , Rome Fastener Sales Corporation , Romag Fasteners, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Romag Fasteners, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc.
Appellant: David Jaroslawicz , Jaroslawicz & Jaros, Abelman, Frayne & Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Treeline Investment Partners, LP et al v. Koren et al
as 1:2007cv01964
Plaintiff: Treeline Investment Partners, LP and David Jaroslawicz
Defendant: Gary Koren and Killy Koren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?