Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stith v. David L Moss Criminal Justice Center et al
as 4:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wayne Stith
Defendant:
David L Moss Criminal Justice Center and David Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wirtz v. Regalado et al
as 4:2018cv00599
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, William Cooper, Turn Key Health Clinics and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wirtz, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shane Ellis
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office, David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center et al
as 4:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
Charles K Johnston, Jr
Defendant:
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center, Tulsa County Jail Infirmary and Officer Krawcheck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redford v. David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center et al
as 4:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
Earl Redford
Defendant:
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center, Billy Byrd, Gov State of Okla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redford v. David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center et al
as 4:2014cv00720
Plaintiff:
Earl Redford
Defendant:
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center, Gov. OK, DO McKenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaffney v. David L Moss Medical Department
as 4:2013cv00747
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ray Gaffney, II
Defendant:
David L Moss Medical Department and David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center et al
as 4:2012cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Deon Moore
Defendant:
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2010cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jeron Lorenzo Middleton
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
