Cases 11 - 20 of 202
McGoldrick et. al. v. Davol, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv05529
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael McGoldrick and Anne Marie McGoldrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McGoldrick et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05529
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael McGoldrick and Anne Marie McGoldrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Szalach v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01102
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Szalach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tuchman v. Davol Inc. et al
as 7:2019cv08035
Plaintiff:
Steven Tuchman
Defendant:
Davol Inc., Davol-Bard Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eliopoulos v. C.R. Bard Inc. et. al.
as 2:2018cv05587
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Eliopoulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falcon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05432
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy Falcon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv01156
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Candace Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Domingues v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04644
Plaintiff:
Bradford Domingues
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gordon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04508
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Demos et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03874
Defendant:
Benton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Demos and Theodore Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
