Cases 31 - 40 of 23,078
Gomez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02039
Plaintiff:
Oscar Gomez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tirado v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
Raul E. Tirado
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02005
Plaintiff:
Vance Aaron Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elder v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
Phillip Elder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robison et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Johnny P. Robison and Malinda Robison
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sizemore et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Steven Perry Sizemore and Alyssa Sizemore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02017
Plaintiff:
Rosina Hooks
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
James Warren Willis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romero v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Romero, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
