Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Rita Hall v. Davol Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01676
Plaintiff:
Rita Hall and Rita Hall
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Bard Devices Inc, C R Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02476
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C R Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Melom v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009at00603
Plaintiff:
Patricia Melom
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Melom v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01334
Plaintiff:
Patricia Melom
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv03394
Plaintiff:
Manuel Torres and Manuel Torres
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carlos Fontanes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03003
Plaintiff:
Carlos Fontanes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reuther et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00944
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Reuther and Robert A. Reuther
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., California Pacific Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Patricia Caro v. Davol Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
Patricia Caro and Patricia Caro
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Arta Mae Lewis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv06781
Plaintiff:
Arta Mae Lewis, Arta Mae Lewis, Arta Mae Lewis and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Collins v C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01840
Plaintiff:
Shirley Collins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
