Cases 21 - 30 of 23,143
Long v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02537
Plaintiff:
Daniel Long
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maldonado v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
Joe Maldonado
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tuggle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
James Tuggle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02505
Plaintiff:
James Stein
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marathas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02540
Plaintiff:
James Marathas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02515
Plaintiff:
Lorren Wilson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tunstall v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02512
Plaintiff:
Stuart Tunstall
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valentine v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Valentine
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zendejas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02516
Plaintiff:
Emilio Zendejas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ratliff v. Bard Davol, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02517
Plaintiff:
Allen Ratliff
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
