Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 27,262
Romero v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff: Ernest J. Romero, Jr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02016
Plaintiff: Marion Jones
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Madariaga Arrizuriet v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff: Delia Madariaga Arrizuriet
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armsterd v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02007
Plaintiff: Charles Armsterd
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haywood v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff: Lakecia L. Haywood
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samaniego v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff: David Samaniego
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stagner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02003
Plaintiff: David H. Stagner
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01994
Plaintiff: Michael Pearson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01998
Plaintiff: Gylsa Campos
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hirmer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01991
Plaintiff: Peter Hirmer
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?