Cases 41 - 50 of 23,050
Powell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02450
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Downing v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02453
Plaintiff:
Patrick Albert Downing
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Black v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02455
Plaintiff:
Myron Lynn Black
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooke v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
Dolores Brooke
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02430
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02431
Plaintiff:
James Watkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Britt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02434
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Britt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyler v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02439
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lee Tyler
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gregory v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02443
Plaintiff:
Patti C. Gregory
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kimber v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Kyle Kimber
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
