Cases 1 - 10 of 384
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boren v. Kinnate Biopharma Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Morgan Boren
Defendant:
Kinnate Biopharma Inc., Dean J. Mitchell, Nima Farzan and others
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Marc Harris v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00007
Plaintiff:
Marc Harris
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology, LLC and others
Galina Vugman v. Alteryx, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Galina Vugman
Defendant:
Alteryx, Inc., Dean Stoecker, Mark Anderson and others
Stephens v. Maplebear Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Andy Dean Stephens
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart, Fidji Simo, Nick Giovanni and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bakhtiari et al v. Comerica Bank, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Hamid R. Bakhtiari and Parichehr Etemadi
Defendant:
Comerica Bank, Inc., Int Sports Mgmt. Vidante World Resort, Louis Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley James Much v. Dr. Dean Roy Larson et al
as 2:2023cv10170
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Much
Defendant:
Dr. Dean Roy Larson, John Doe and Jane Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
