Cases 1 - 5 of 5
ZEBROWSKI et al v. EVONIK DEGUSSA CORPORATION ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE et al
as 2:2010cv00542
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. ZEBROWSKI, ROBERT A. WOODRUFF and GREGORY BIALY
Defendant:
EVONIK DEGUSSA CORPORATION ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, EVONIK DEGUSSA CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN and EVONIK ROHMAX USA, INC. NON-QUALIFIED PENSION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MCSHARES, INC. v. SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02265
Plaintiff:
MCSHARES, INC.
Defendant:
SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC., SOLVAY S.A., SOLVAY INTEROX, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHEM-WAY CORPORATION v. ARKEMA S.A. et al
as 2:2007cv02938
Plaintiff:
CHEM-WAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
ARKEMA S.A., FMC CORPORATION, SOLVAY AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
HAWTHORNE v. ARKEMA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00976
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. HAWTHORNE, RICHARD B. HAWTHORNE, HAWTHORNE PAINTING and others
Defendant:
ARKEMA, INC., ARKEMA, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ACE CONCRETE v. ARKEMA INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00488
Plaintiff:
ACE CONCRETE, ACE CONCRETE and ACE CONCRETE
Defendant:
ARKEMA INC., ARKEMA S.A., SARTOMER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
