Cases 1 - 10 of 15
In re: Vreeland, II
as 22-1401
Petitioner:
In re: DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent:
DAVID ZUPAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Vreeland v. Olson, et al
as 21-1364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR JAMES OLSON, CDOC/AVCF, MAJOR SCOTT GROVER, CDOC/AVCF, CASE MANAGER MS. REED, CDOC/AVCF and others
Vreeland v. Harlow
as 21-8067
Petitioner / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary
Delmart Vreeland, II v. People's Rep. of China, et al
as 21-5112
Defendant / Appellee:
S. Kato Crews, United States District Court Magistrate Judge, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Wuhan, China, William Little, Warden of Colorado Department of Corrections CSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II
Vreeland v. Vigil, et al
as 21-1052
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR MAUL, ANDREW RINGEL, CARLEY DAVIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Vreeland v. Weiser, et al
as 20-1385
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK J. MULLIGAN, Attorney at Law, DAVID ZUPAN, Colorado Department of Corrections Warden, RYAN CRANE, Assistant Colorado Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Vreeland v. Raemisch, et al
as 20-1383
Defendant / Appellee:
AMICH & JENKS, COLORADO SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT BOARD ALL MEMBERS, CDOC DIRECTOR OF SOTMP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Vreeland v. Vigil, et al
as 20-1302
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW RINGEL, MAUL, CARLEY DAVIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Vreeland v. Huss
as 20-1301
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT CHARLES HUSS, Esq.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
In re: Vreeland, et al
as 20-1200
Petitioner:
In re: DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and DAVID ZUPAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
