Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 244
Angie Walker v. USDA, et al
as 21-35723
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGIE WALKER
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RAMONA MITCHELL, Multi-Family Housing Program Director, JAY DELAPP, Area Specialist and others
Unite the Parks, et al v. USFS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16238
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITE THE PARKS, SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER and EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S.Department of the Interior
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Carl Petrick, et al
as 21-35504
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior, CARL PETRICK, his official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Idaho Panhandle National Forests and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Center for Food Safety, et al v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 21-15883
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, LONG WIND FARM, INC., MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, BRUCE SUMMERS, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and others
Neighbors Agst Bison Slaughter, et al v. Nat'l Park Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-35144
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Acting Secretary of the Interior, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BONNIE LYNN and NEIGHBORS AGAINST BISON SLAUGHTER
Apache Stronghold v. USA, et al
as 21-15295
Defendant / Appellee: NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, TOM TORRES, Acting Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: APACHE STRONGHOLD, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
Amicus Curiae: RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LAW SCHOLARS, NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS, A TRIBAL ELDER, AND OTHER FEDERAL INDIAN LAW SCHOLARS AND ORGANIZATIONS, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, THE SIKH COALITION, AND PROTECT THE 1st and others
United Farm Workers, et al v. Sonny Perdue, et al
as 20-17510
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED FARM WORKERS and UFW FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellant: SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and WILLIAM NORTHEY, in his official capacity as Under Secretary, Farm Production and Conservation
Matthew Smith, et al v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al
as 20-36057
Appellant: ANN CORKERY, KEVIN CORKERY, PAUL CALLEN and others
Defendant / Appellee: RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Counter Claimant: TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Friends of the Bitterroot v. Leanne Marten, et al
as 20-36041
Defendant / Appellee: LEANNE MARTEN, Regional Forester of Region One of the U.S. Forest Service and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRIENDS OF THE BITTERROOT
Friends of the Bitterroot v. Leanne Marten, et al
as 20-36032
Defendant / Appellant: LEANNE MARTEN, Regional Forester of Region One of the U.S. Forest Service and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE BITTERROOT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?