Cases 1 - 10 of 20
SCOTT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WAYNE SCOTT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Cobble v. United States of America et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019mc00016
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3720
Baker, Jr v. Harris County District Attorney et al
as 6:2018cv00010
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Baker, Jr
Respondent:
Harris County District Attorney, Talbot County Superior Court, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heard et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017mi00093
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard and Antwan K. Jackson
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections and City of Gainesville, GA
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
COBBLE v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017mc00018
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
JEFF B SESSIONS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGIA REGIONAL MENTAL HOSPITALS COLUMBUS and others
v. COBBLE et al
as 1:2017mc00014
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
JEFF B SESSIONS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PETE SMITH and others
Jordan et al v. Fisher
as 1:2016cv02582
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher
Movant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Inc. v. Ryan
as 1:2016mi00049
Defendant:
Charles L. Ryan
Movant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Inc.
Jordan et al v. Fisher
as 1:2016mi00040
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher
Movant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Price v. Dunn
as 1:2016cv01651
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Price
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn
Movant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
