Cases 1 - 10 of 489
Lewis v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
RACQUEL LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
L v. Decker
as 24-718
Petitioner:
J L
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Casilla Rosario v. Searls
as 24-379
Petitioner:
ROBERT CASILLA ROSARIO
Respondent:
JEFFREY SEARLS, in his official capacity as Officer-in-Charge, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Muzumala v. Mayorkas
as 24-157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA MUZUMALA
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE)
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and TAE JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
Hodge v. Mayorkas
as 23-7988
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSVALDO HODGE
Respondent / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, THOMAS BROPHY, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Astakhov et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2023cv07565
Plaintiff:
Stanislav Astakhov, Alona Astakhova, Yevhenii Shapiro and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 jr Judicial Review
Bamba v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS-FPS)
as 23-7380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIANKANZE BAMBA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and CHAD WOLF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
