Cases 1 - 10 of 2,295
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv08244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mahmoud Nasser Aly et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv10054
Plaintiff:
Hend Samy Habib and Mahmoud Nasser Aly
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ho et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2024cv02558
Defendant:
Ted H. Kim, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Plaintiff:
Chun Kuen Chan and Fang Man Ho
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv08187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv08053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv08054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv08017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
