Cases 11 - 18 of 18
SAEKU v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
SOMSAK SAEKU
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, TERRENCE W. BOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPLE et al v. CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. SAMPLE, BERNARD SHAW, RUSSELL MARKS and others
Defendant:
CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDDICK v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2010cv02046
Plaintiff:
GEORGE REDDICK
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2009cv02455
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COMER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF U.S. ATTORNEY'S, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOCKERY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2008cv00806
Plaintiff:
JASPER LLOYD DOCKERY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CALLAWAY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2004cv01506
Plaintiff:
HENRY CALLAWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY , UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
