Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Wilcher v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2009cv10820
Plaintiff:
Jermont Wilcher
Defendant:
Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Mason et al
as 5:2009cv10121
Plaintiff:
Theodore Williams and Nancy Price
Defendant:
Khary Mason, Terry Cross-Nelson, Otis Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2008cv14909
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and Darryl Randall
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stephens v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2008cv12827
Plaintiff:
William Stephens
Defendant:
Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Ramsey v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2008cv11454
Plaintiff:
Marvin Ramsey
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Derrick Mahone and Cheri Snow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Swanigan v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2008cv10861
Plaintiff:
Tammi Swanigan and Tammi Swanigan
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and Robert Dunlap
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Garrett v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2008cv10717
Plaintiff:
Raymond Garrett
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Terry Sutton and Sherry Nichols
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2008cv10473
Plaintiff:
Louella Smith, Warren Smith, Randy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Abella, Arnold Sheard and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ellison v. Balinski et al
as 2:2007cv14795
Plaintiff:
Ronald P Ellison, Jr
Defendant:
Denise Balinski, Ella Bully-Cummings and Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Eason v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2007cv14359
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eason
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Detroit Police Department, Lameka Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
