Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Culley et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2024cv01273
Plaintiff:
Samuel Culley, Thomas Price and Ervan Waters
Defendant:
Leland Robinson, Pillow Talk Inc., Ben Ghazi Music, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Robinson et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01226
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robinson, Jr., Diamond Head Music, Inc., Henry Jackson and others
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cook et al v. Sugar Hill Publishing, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv02632
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Cook , Gwendolyn Chisolm and The Estate of William A. Stewart Jr.
Defendant:
Sugar Hill Publishing, Ltd. , Diamond Head Music, Inc. , Joey Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Diamond Head Music, Inc. v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv08169
Plaintiff:
Diamond Head Music, Inc.
Defendant:
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 2K Sports. Inc., Visual Concepts Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Diamond Head Music, Inc. v. Malaco Music, Inc.
as 1:2009cv08044
Plaintiff:
Diamond Head Music, Inc.
Defendant:
Malaco Music, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Diamond Head Music, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2009cv01024
Plaintiff:
Diamond Head Music, Inc.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2008cv09830
Defendant:
Sylvia Robinson, Sugar Hill Music Publishing, Ltd., Sylvia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Guy O'Brien and Michael Wright
Counter Claimant:
Diamond Head Music Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
CLYDE OTIS MUSIC GROUP, INC., THE v. EMUSICA RECORDS, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv03112
Plaintiff:
CLYDE OTIS MUSIC GROUP, INC., THE
Defendant:
EMUSICA RECORDS, LLC, DIAMOND HEAD MUSIC INC., GAMBI MUSIC INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
