Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. JALA HOSPITALITY LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01934
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
JALA HOSPITALITY LLC, ZINALKUMAR PATEL, BHAVESH JAVI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. MANOMAY, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv07621
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
MANOMAY, LLC, PRANIT PATEL, DIPAK PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. SWAMI, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02456
Plaintiff:
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
SWAMI, LLC and DIPAK PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. PARTH HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05024
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
PARTH HOSPITALITY, LLC, YASMIN PATEL, SHAILESH PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATEL et al v. PATEL et al
as 2:2011cv07603
Plaintiff:
DHIRU PATEL
Defendant:
BHARAT PATEL , SATISH PATEL , DIPAK PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANNA MANAGEMENT, INC. v. PATEL et al
as 2:2009cv04936
Plaintiff:
ANNA MANAGEMENT, INC., DIPAK PATEL and ANAND PATEL
Defendant:
BRIJESH PATEL, JAYANTI PATEL, PANESH PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. PATEL
as 2:2008cv03045
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
DIPAK PATEL
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. ANUJA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01841
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant:
ANUJA, INC., ARVIND PATEL, DIPAK PATEL and others
Cross Claimant:
ANUJA, INC. and ARVIND PATEL
Cross Defendant:
ANIL PATEL, DIPAK PATEL and ANAND PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
