Cases 1 - 9 of 9
District Counsel 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Linoleum Larry's, Inc.
as 3:2011cv05197
Plaintiff:
District Counsel 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees , Doug Christopher , District Council 16 Northern California Apprentice & Journeyman Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Linoleum Larry's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
District Counsel 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Linoleum Larry's, Inc.
as 4:2011cv05197
Plaintiff:
District Counsel 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees , Doug Christopher , District Council 16 Northern California Apprentice & Journeyman Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Linoleum Larry's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Russell Hinton Co. v. District Counsel 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades et al
as 3:2011cv01627
Plaintiff:
Russell Hinton Co.
Defendant:
District Counsel 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades and Doug Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell Hinton Co. v. District Counsel 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades et al
as 4:2011cv01627
Plaintiff:
Russell Hinton Co.
Defendant:
District Counsel 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades and Doug Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. O P & Sons Construction et al
as 3:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees and others
Defendant:
O P & Sons Construction, Myrna Rae Dammarell and Vernon Keith Dammarell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. O P & Sons Construction et al
as 4:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees and others
Defendant:
O P & Sons Construction, Myrna Rae Dammarell and Vernon Keith Dammarell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Albert White Co., Inc.
as 3:2008cv04717
Plaintiff:
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Albert White Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Albert White Co., Inc.
as 4:2008cv04717
Plaintiff:
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Albert White Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bay Arean Painters and Tapers Pension Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Health Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Joint Apprenticeship Training Funds, and Their Joint Boards of Trustees et al v. White
as 4:2007cv02653
Plaintiff:
Bay Arean Painters and Tapers Pension Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Health Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Joint Apprenticeship Training Funds, and Their Joint Boards of Trustees, Bay Arean Painters and Tapers Pension Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Health Fund, Bay Area Painters and Tapers Joint Apprenticeship Training Funds, and Their Joint Boards of Trustees, Fred Inman and others
Defendant:
Robert Scott White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
