Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. 10.1824 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lots 669 and 700 of the 17th Land District and 3rd Section, of Bartow County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv03290
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
10.1824 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lots 669 and 700 of the 17th Land District and 3rd Section, of Bartow County, Georgia, Tim Denson , Tera Denson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Byers v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 1:2016cv02218
Plaintiff:
George Byers
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Roberts et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01960
Plaintiff:
Ursula Roberts and Lee A. Roberts
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
ANDRADE v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
as 3:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
KENDALL ANDRADE
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC
Cause Of Action: Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radio Telegraphs
Gatlin et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00615
Plaintiff:
Charles Louis Gatlin and Noel A. Gatlin
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC, The Federal National Mortgage Association, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
