Cases 1 - 9 of 9
South Pacific Petroleum Corporation v. MB Guam, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
South Pacific Petroleum Corporation
Defendant:
MB Guam, Inc., Brian Y. Suhr, Michael S. Hahm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
AHRMDCO International, LLC v. Bustamante et al
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
AHRMDCO International, LLC
Defendant:
Luis E. Bustamante and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
MCL Fresh, Inc. v. SH Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2014mc00009
Plaintiff:
MCL Fresh, Inc.
Defendant:
SH Enterprises, Inc., Hui Min, Tae Ho Min and others
Slapp v. Toelkes et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Noel Slapp
Defendant:
William Toelkes , International Bridge and Construction Marianas Incorporated and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Slapp v. Toelkes et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Noel Slapp
Defendant:
William Toelkes , International Bridge and Construction Marianas Incorporated and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Lucky Dragon Development Co., LTD et al
as 1:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lucky Dragon Development Co., LTD, Pacmax Enterprise Corp., Legend Stone Corp., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Cyfred, Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Cyfred, Ltd.
Defendant:
Ticor Title Insurance Company and Does One (1) through Three Hundred (300)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cyfred, Ltd. v. First American Title Insurance Company et al
as 1:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Cyfred, Ltd.
Defendant:
First American Title Insurance Company and Does One (1) through Three Hundred (300)
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cyfred, Ltd. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company et al
as 1:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Cyfred, Ltd.
Defendant:
Stewart Title Guaranty Company and Does One (1) through Three Hundred (300)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
