Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vivid Impact Company, LLC v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
Vivid Impact Company, LLC
Defendant:
Michael L. Ellis, Clark and Riggs Printing, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Gun Media Holdings, Inc. v. Does 1-10
as 5:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Gun Media Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Mattingly v. Breckinridge County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
Robert Mattingly
Defendant:
Breckinridge County Jail, Tara Shrewsberry, Josh Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dish Network, LLC v. Fields et al
as 6:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Dish Network, LLC
Defendant:
James L. Fields, Daniel Boone Motor Inn, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nevada-Martinez et al v. Ahmad et al
as 5:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Nevada-Martinez , Carlos Alberto Macias-Ramirez , John and Jane Does and others
Defendant:
Weal Ahmad , Anna Garcia and Ahmad Law Office, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
The Jockey Club Information Systems, Inc. v. Doe Nos. 1-5
as 5:2015cv00204
Defendant:
John Doe Nos. 1-5
Plaintiff:
The Jockey Club Information Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles v. Winchester et al
as 6:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Betty Charles
Defendant:
Merril A. Winchester, Winchester, Patton and Burgess, P.S.C., McCreary Christian Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Blackman v. Nationwide Debt Management Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
Brittany Blackman
Defendant:
Nationwide Debt Management Solutions, LLC and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
