Cases 41 - 50 of 1,423
FingerMotion, Inc. v. Capybara Research et al
as 1:2023cv09212
Plaintiff:
FingerMotion, Inc.
Defendant:
Capybara Research, JOHN AND JANE DOE #1-#10 and John Does 1-10
Nominal Defendant:
Wix.com Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Gem Financial Service, Inc. v. City of New York
as 23-7298
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEM FINANCIAL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL KAMINSKY, (a majority shareholder of GEM Financial Service, Inc.) and KEITH WATTS
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-10
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07647
Plaintiff:
Mullen Automotive, Inc. and Ulysses Novoa
Defendant:
TD Ameritrade, Inc., Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVCIES, LLC and others
New York Knicks, LLC v. Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment LTD. d/b/a Toronto Raptors et al
as 1:2023cv07394
Plaintiff:
New York Knicks, LLC
Defendant:
Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment LTD. d/b/a Toronto Raptors, Darko Rajakovi, Noah Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Kampuries v. Port Authority of New Jersey et al
as 1:2023cv07195
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Kampuries
Defendant:
Port Authority of New Jersey, John Doe #1-#10 and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Citadel Securities Americas LLC et al v. Portofino Technologies AG et al
as 1:2023cv05222
Plaintiff:
Citadel Securities Americas LLC, Citadel Securities Americas Services LLC, Citadel Securities (Europe) Limited and others
Defendant:
Portofino Technologies AG, Portofino Technologies USA, Inc., Jean Canzoneri and others
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Menczer v. Rochlitz et al
as 1:2023cv04096
Plaintiff:
Joseph Menczer, Naftaly Mayer Rochlitz and Brenda Rochlitz
Defendant:
Chaim Rochlitz, Binyomin Z. Bendet and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, PC et al v. Double Why Design, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03842
Plaintiff:
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, PC and Naon Physical Therapy P.C.
Defendant:
Double Why Design, Inc., Young Jun Youn, Barbra Joanne Mangibin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, P.C. et al v. Double Why Design, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03842
Plaintiff:
Bayside Wellness Physical Therapy, P.C. and Naon Physical Therapy P.C.
Defendant:
Double Why Design, Inc., Young Jun Youn, Barbra Joanne Mangibin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
