Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jonathan Riches v. xG Technology, et al
as 10-13484
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
XG TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, RICHARD L. MOOERS, an individual, ROGER G. BRANTON and others
:
SERVICE
Bank Hapoalim (Switzerland) v. Jonathan Lee Riches, et al
as 10-12151
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BANK HAPOALIM (SWITZERLAND) LTD., a Swiss corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
XG TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, RICHARD L. MOOERS, an individual, ROGER G. BRANTON, an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bio Cybernetics International v. Burkhart Roentgen International, Inc. et al
as 8:2008mc00154
Plaintiff:
Bio Cybernetics International
Defendant:
Burkhart Roentgen International, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
May v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00839
Plaintiff:
Andrea May
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Fedex Corporation, New England Motor Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Waldmann et al v. Cingular Wireless L.L.C. et al
as 9:2007cv80081
Plaintiff:
Jane Waldmann, Jane Waldmann, Jane Waldmann and others
Defendant:
Cingular Wireless L.L.C., Cingular Wireless L.L.C., Cingular Wireless L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lacome v. Hyman et al
as 8:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lacome
Defendant:
Matthew Bernard Hyman, Zachary Alan Hyman, Melissa Fassett and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 0101 Bankruptcy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
