Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Hutchins v. Modern Woodmen Fraternal Financial et al
as 3:2013cv00230
Plaintiff:
Mary Hanna Hutchins
Defendant:
Modern Woodmen Fraternal Financial , William D. Keltner , Laura McKillip and others
Cross_claimant:
Laura McKillip and Modern Woodmen Fraternal Financial
Cross_defendant:
Freda Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Shane Nelson
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc. , Renovo Services, LLC , John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Whitfield v. City of Ridgeland et al
as 3:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwight Whitfield
Defendant:
City of Ridgeland, Ridgeland Police Department, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Seyah Hospice Care, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Seyah Hospice Care, Inc. and Bobbie Flemming
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Donald Berwick , Robert L. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
