Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 3:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH E. HEARN-NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA BARLATHER SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 2:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HAREMZA et al v. JOHN DOES 1-15 et al
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
MARY HAREMZA and JACOB MURRAY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-15, AANIIIH NAKODA FINANCE, LLC doing business as BRIGHT LENDING, TERRY BROCKIE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
STERK et al v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv11059
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MAHER and CASEY STERK
Defendant:
COREY FLAUM, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA and JOHN DOES 1-15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv05790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MURDOCK v. BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER et al
as 2:2008cv02268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MURDOCK
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER, BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT, DONALD MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
