Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Matthews v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Clinton T Matthews
Defendant:
Warden Tyrell Davis, Warden Randall L. Valley, Idaho State Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cousins, et al.
as 1:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Chadlen DeWayne Smith
Defendant:
Blaine Cousins, Denise Wooldrige, B. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bangs, et al.
as 2:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Chadlen DeWayne Smith
Defendant:
Justin Bangs, C. Wade, J. Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGiboney v. Corizon et al
as 1:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Cindy Wilson, Board of Corrections, Debbie Field and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee McGiboney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barcella v. Corizon Medical et al
as 1:2020cv00427
Defendant:
CCHP - RN, Director Josh Tewalt, John Does I - X and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Angelo Barcella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rettew, et al. v. Cassia County, et al.
as 4:2020cv00329
Defendant:
David Hirsch, Cassia County, Mini-Cassia Criminal Justice Center and others
Plaintiff:
Krista Mosley, Javonna Rettew and Kenneth Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGiboney v. Corizon et al
as 1:2018cv00529
Plaintiff:
Joshua McGiboney
Defendant:
Ron Sutherlin, Rebbekka Haggard, Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbert v. Field et al
as 1:2018cv00470
Defendant:
Cindy Wilson, Debbie Field, Aaron Hofer and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Halbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVan v. Hiens et al
as 1:2016cv00548
Plaintiff:
Evin DeVan
Defendant:
Hiens, Brown, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brooks et al
as 1:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Chadlen DeWayne Smith
Defendant:
Jakob Brooks, Burns, Schuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
