Cases 1 - 10 of 324
Padilla Cantillano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1918
Petitioner:
HENRY ALEXANDER PADILLA CANTILLANO, I, REINA LETICIA INTERIANO DOMINGUEZ, KEVIN ALEXANDER PADILLA INTERIANO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Hernandez-Dominguez v. Garland
as 24-902
Petitioner:
JERBER ANIBAL HERNANDEZ-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bakhtiari et al v. Comerica Bank, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Hamid R. Bakhtiari and Parichehr Etemadi
Defendant:
Comerica Bank, Inc., Int Sports Mgmt. Vidante World Resort, Louis Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Dominguez
as 23-4250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALFREDO ROJO DOMINGUEZ
Zepeda-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3906
Petitioner:
LUIS FELIPE ZEPEDA-MARTINEZ, ARLENA SARAHI DOMINGUEZ-FUNEZ and ENOC ZEPEDA-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Selene Finance, LP
as 3:2023cv06225
Plaintiff:
Rick S Dominguez
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez Dominguez v. Garland
as 23-3888
Petitioner:
RAMON GONZALEZ DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Pratt, et al.
as 23-3705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIJAH DOMINGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN PRATT, Chief of Police, DEREK MILLER, Officer, DEREK BUTTS, Deputy District Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
